Movie review: The Time Traveler’s Wife

Before I get to my spoiler-free movie review, I have to write about why I wanted to throttle my father today.  I got home from the gym today and Bay wasn’t anywhere in the room… not on the bed, in her cave, under the bed.  Not a good sign.  I started looking everywhere she could be… but still, no Bay.  I asked my dad if he had seen her and he mentioned that he had gone into the garage to get something and oh maybe she got in there.  Say what?!  My mom had left for church while I was out and I had visions of Bay getting out of the house… and getting into trouble.  But no, my dad insisted that he had seen Bay since my mother left.

So I turned the house upside down, yelled at my father to help look for her (he had been just yelling for her, which does no good) and was on the verge of tears when my dad finally found her: she had indeed gotten into the garage and then tucked herself away in the corner, underneath some table thingy.  Oh my word, I’ve never been so happy to see her… poor thing, I think she was completely freaked out too.  Unfortunately, my dad still doesn’t think that leaving doors open does any harm… as he said, “she didn’t get anywhere…”  Um, she got into the garage.  That’s somewhere.

ANYWAY, on to my move review… “The Time Traveler’s Wife”.  I had been looking forward to this movie for ages – I have read this book multiple upon multiple times and it has been a favorite of mine.  Plus I adore Rachel McAdams and the movie previews looked so good… however, I tried not to get my hopes up because movies are never as good as books.

I’m afraid I cannot be objective on this review whatsoever – the *entire* time I was comparing the book to the movie.  Even worse than when I saw Harry Potter.  So I honestly can’t step back from the book and say how I felt about the movie apart from the book.  In fact, I don’t even really know how I felt about the movie – I didn’t hate, but I didn’t love it.  I would watch it again but I don’t know that I would pay to watch it again.  I did think the acting was good, it moved me to tears at the end, and the premise itself is interesting, if not a bit hard to wrap your head around.  However, I didn’t think the characters were the well developed, especially the supporting characters – in fact, you almost kind of wonder why the supporting characters were there, since they left out most everything about them from the book.

I do thing that it is probably better to read the book first, because the movie left out so much that some parts might be a bit confusing.  That being said, I can’t get over how MUCH the movie left out.   They left out scenes I didn’t particularly care for but also scenes that I considered important, that I wanted to see in the movie. They cut out entire characters that were very significant in the book (tho, granted, I never did like Ingrid).  I missed that they didn’t focus on Claire (the main & title character)’s early childhood, like they did in the book – it made everything more magical somehow.  In fact, the relationship between Henry (btw I love the way Rachel McAdams says that name) and Claire seems more magical in the book… I missed that.

I’m not sure what else to say.  I guess I basically found the movie disappointing, and I really wanted to like it.  I still recommend the book and if anything, I do think people might like to see the movie after reading the book.

I hope that make sense.  I’m almost tempted to watch the movie again to try to make more sense of it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

« « Siiiigh…| Oregon pics » »
  • Carol
    I guess this review just reinforces my lack of interest in seeing movies... the book is *always* better. You create a vision in your head as you read, and the producer's/director's vision is probably not going to match and disappointment ensues.
  • I think there is only one time that I have preferred the movie to the book and that would be Julie & Julia. The movie was adorable, but the book itself seemed tedious and not that interesting.

    But that's just me.

    Otherwise, you're totally right... the books are always better. I think it could also be because the books are able to go into more detail about a character's feelings and thoughts...
  • This is a great review! I saw this film while on holiday last week and I completely agree with everything you said! I'm glad I'd read the book - I think if you hadn't you wouldn't get the movie because so much was left out - and yet I was disappointed that they'd had to leave so much out - especially developing the characters. You are spot on!
  • Oh good! While I was watching the movie and then writing the review, I was trying to think of the movie WITHOUT the book, to see if the book was helping me understand things or if it was explained in the movie. But I really did think that the movie could be potentially confusing without the book. And definitely less interesting.
  • Oh, I am so excited to see this. I think this week...
  • Let me know what you think!
  • chelseasteed
    Yay, I've finally gotten around to reading your review! Hmmm... I have to say that my roommate said basically the same thing about My Sister's Keeper (which haven't haven't watched yet either). They didn't develop the characters enough, and left out several important subplots. I think that the problem is that both these books are extremely good and have such a fan base already that it's a bit like shooting yourself in the foot to make a movie out of it! It's near impossible to get it right!

    So I reckon I'll read the books first and then watch the movies. (; Oh... and I also reckon I'm on Heather's Bad People List. For shame! :D

    So sorry you had to experience that scare with Bay! When I was in middle school we thought we'd lost my cat Hamilton. We searched all over the house, calling his name, looking *everywhere*. We even grabbed flashlights (it was dark outside already) and walked around the block, calling for him. This was when I lived in San Diego and there are coyotes that come out at night, even in the neighborhood, so we were sooooo worried that he'd gotten outside and been eaten. When we got back inside we heard mewing and discovered that he'd somehow opening a low cupboard door in the kitchen and snuck inside. That booger! But we were sooooo glad to find him! I think he nearly got smothered we were giving him so many hugs and kisses!
  • Ah yes, I thought the same thing about My Sister's Keeper... not only did they leave out important things in that movie, but they also made stuff up! Rawr.

    Awww so glad that Hamilton was okay, that definitely must have been a scare!!
  • Laura Castle
    Sounds like I need to make a trip to the library, hope they'll have a copy for me.

    Was it okay to post that picture of my trucks 200,000 miles in the comment section of your pic of the odometer? If not, let me know and I'll remove it. Derrick said that sometimes people might not like it cuz it might look like you're trying to show up their picture. That wasn't my intention.

    My KitKat will make a super pest out of herself if I don't let her go outside. She keeps coming home with stickems on her back and tail. She'll go out four or five times a day and once in a while she'll stay out all night, but she always comes home. And if she wants in, she comes to the bedroom windows and sits there and stares in. The ground is burmed outside our bedroom windows.

    Glad Bay is okay.
  • Ooops forgot to reply here. Hope you can find a copy of the book! Oh and as I said on flickr, totally didn't mind the odometer pic!

    Ah, Bay has never been an outdoor cat and since she doesn't have her front claws, she never will be. The whole wandering off thing makes me nervous..
  • TotallyHeather
    Oh... This is sad. I love this book. And to have found out that the movie is just blah does not make me particularly happy.

    I remember first reading the book in high school on a recommendation from my friend Alice. She said I would love it. She was right. And when I found out they had made a movie about it, I was thrilled.

    And then you said they didn't focus on Claire's childhood. How could they not? It's so integral to the story! It's not just magical but it's their entire relationship. Not to say they didn't have a relationship in later years but this is the foundation. It's fundamental to the story.

    Not thrilled at all.

    Also, very sorry to hear about Bay! That's terrible. Poor little girl. I remember my mom and dad were taking care of Smudge for me one summer. And Dad had this brilliant idea to take her for a walk on a leash since a lot of people in their neighborhood do that. So he bought her a small DOG harness and a leash. Well, she hates the outdoors and I told him that. She got out of her harness and took off running. He searched everywhere for her. And finally found her hiding in the wheel-well of his car. She wouldn't go near windows or the door for days and she wouldn't go near my dad either. Of course, I didn't find out any of this until after-the-fact. I guess all my mother kept saying was, "If you lose her cat, she will hate you forever!"
  • They spent a little time on Claire's childhood but not a lot. Same with Henry - they spent a little bit of time dealing with his family, but not nearly enough to explain so much of what happened. In fact, it's to the point where you almost HAVE to read the book before you see the movie, otherwise it might not make sense.

    Oh my, so glad to hear Smudge was okay! That's my FEAR, that Bay will get out. So lucky that your cat was hiding in the car, so close to home!
  • justtheashes
    I soooo want to see this movie.
    But, I will not see a movie before I read a book. And I havent read it yet. Boo.
  • Read it... now!
  • TotallyHeather
    Ooooooo! How could you not have read this book? You're going on my bad people list hahah.
  • justtheashes
    Sorry!! Ill have to get it from the library or something
  • TotallyHeather
    Can you read quickly and without bending the binding (it's another OCD of mine... I'm very difficult, I'm now just realizing haha)? Cause i'll lend you mine. It's such an easy read. Takes me about 2 hours to read (because of my superhuman speed reading abilities.... Ok, just my speed reading abilities)
  • Lol, the last time I read it, I stayed up until 3am to finish it. It sucks me right in. If I weren't currently in the middle of reading FOUR books, I might try to reread the book again.

    Hmmm, in fact... :)
  • justtheashes
    Hm. I might be able to finish it that weekend. I don't know about the bindings tho. Maybe safer to get it from the library
  • See, I felt like the characters were really undeveloped in the book, so I'm not surprised. And also I couldn't imagine how they could have kept everything in, at times I felt like there was just too much - too much description, too many angles, to many random moments that didn't do anything for the story, etc. and not enough showing me who Henry and Claire really were. They could have been anyone, totally unmemorable for me, you know? Heh, I guess I didn't like the book as much as you did, and probably would feel disappointed by the movie too.
  • Yeah you're right, there was a lot in the book now that I think about it. But I liked the characters, a lot. Although the most recent reread kind of lost me a bit of the charm for some reason.
blog comments powered by Disqus